Hot Ukrainian Blonde wants Hard Men to Fuck Putin
she wants it deep & after doing it she wants the Russian to smoke! (it's long)
As Predicted Here: drones-strike-deep-in-russia on Russian oil and gas infrastructure
Go on … do it for Anna.
As predicted here: clawing back air superiority.
Ukraine Seeks to Cut Off Putin's Lifeblood With Attacks Inside Russia https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-russia-drone-attacks-oil-energy-putin-economy-1863905
I wonder where those evil bad nasty gay nazi Ukrainian bad guys got That idea from? ) "Hello, motherfuckers! How the hell are You?" Things I predict actually fucking happen. Not sorry. I. Don't. Fight. Fair!
Muscovite blood purge rages on.
Looks like Gerasimov "ate a gun", huh!
Girkin gets four years in jail, don't be surprised when he "has an accident" or "commits suicide" or even "got in a knife fight with another inmate". He is very likely a dead man walking. Yay! Igor-girkin-russia-trial-verdict
Not Predicted Here: “Slovakia’s Russia-friendly prime minister has made an unexpected U-turn on Ukraine, pledging support on his first trip to the war-torn country only days after questioning its sovereignty.” Financial Times (UK)
I try to err on the side of caution, to never give a false hope, inflated expectations. I would rather not make a false prediction and give you a pleasant surprise than risk disappointing you and losing credibility. Things I predict actually happen. What's Anna's favorite brand? Leave a comment below!
Ukraine's army should take up defensive positions for the next year or so while it gains air superiority and wrecks the Russian rear especially petroleum infrastructure and aircraft too.
Happy talk does not work. Hard nosed calculation does. Maybe this way? Russia has no allies. Not even China. Russia has other countries which are willing to profit from its collapse. Iran and North Korea are also mere opportunists, unreliable. Here's the proof: How many Koreans or Iranians are fighting in Ukraine, hm?
China is a reliable opportunist, profiteering from Russia's collapse, but really really really does not want the war to go on, but also has no way to end it, short of literally invading Russia, which they totally should, but probably will not, until the last minute, when Russia's collapse is clear, and then China will have the justification of protecting Chinese people and Chinese property in the parts of "Russia" that Muscovy stole from China. 解放西伯利亚!
Lying Muscovite scum Sergei Lavrov, having failed to gaslight and bully small ill-armed Ukraine, decides it is time to try to bully and threaten the rest of Europe https://www.newsweek.com/russia-issues-ominous-warning-countries-preparing-war-1863778 I wonder how that will work out for team mafia?
Don Trump was literally in the New York City construction business: casinos too! Of course he IS organized crime. He is also Putin’s puppet.
Putins-crusade-against-nato-delivered-new-blow
https://www.reuters.com/world/hungary-supports-swedens-nato-membership-pm-orban-tells-stoltenberg
Bashkortostan: As Predicted Here... https://jamestown.org/program/bashkir-protests-sending-shockwaves-across-russia-and-beyond/
ISLAMIC WORLD
I need to promote
https://thediplomat.com
/ more. Their writings are always excellent, incisive, yet unbiased. Read them.
https://thediplomat.com/2024/01/pakistan-iran-airstrikes-who-is-paying-the-price/
Predictions:
I predict the Israeli Gaza truce will go through, and any surviving hostages will be released. It is possible Israel may use this opportunity to declare an end to operations in Gaza. That is not my decision to make, obvisouly.
Recomendation: I recommend the Israeli government only cease operations after having destroyed the tunnels. Yes, they are extensive. There are means to destroy them despite that fact. Basically all entrances and exits must be exploded, filled, sealed. Ideally the tunnels themselves will be collapsed or rendered structurally unsafe.
I also expect, as soon as the hostages are released, that Israel will intensify operations against Hamas. Likely different units will be used than were used in Gaza.
During the truce it will be useful if Ukraine somehow get the artillery munitions it so desperately needs.
International law
Unlike domestic law, international law is largely self-help, self-enforcing, and self-executing. It is a sort of cartel law, the cartel of monopolists of legal violence. Palestine isn't a member of the gun-and-hunting club, unlike Israel or other recognized states. Palestine wants to be a member of the gun-and-hunting club (the hunters of men), but to do so would-be aspirants must either be terribly self-controlled and self-regulating about their use of violence, or terribly effective if unbridled. "Palestine", like the "Russian" Federation clearly has chosen the latter path. It will go badly for both of them, but much worse for the would be Palestinians: size matters. The members of the man-hunting club are formally equal, but only formally, factually they are unequal. The Pals badly miscalculated. Did you know? October 7 is Putin's Birthday. Russia Delenda Est.
CHINA
“China says it’s working to de-escalate tensions in the Red Sea that have upended global trade” https://apnews.com/article/china-red-sea-tensions-global-trade-houthis-shipping-4f398a2e9d4143cd10ee729bda129be2
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3249663/
As fucking predicted here EU-slows-down-de-risking-plans-china-face-member-state-resistance (South China Morning Post, HK)
If China were a truly malevolent actor, like we can see in the case of Russia, I would be arguing forcefully and effectively to oust the CCP and liberate China. Oh, but China is almost always a benevolent but self-interested actor. It is not 1964, 1979, or 1989. China moved on from it's crazy experiment in "let's all be equally poor" and is, at worst, a hopeful monster. When was the last Chinese war? 1979. China at worst tolerates or economically enables bad actors, and generally reigns them in. China is a sharp trader, a hard bargainer, and if you get suckered into a bad deal whose fault is that really? China will try to maximize her economic and political position using, like any rational state actor. So? They are not doing so violently, which is why they "get away" with taking advantage of your short-sighted greed, your overly optimistic expectations, your lazy failure to do the basic reading and truly understand the Chinese government and Chinese people.
Guess what else I am working on predicting?
Artificial Intelligence & Drone Warfare
LANGUAGES: Training alien civilizations to communicate with earthlings.
JAPANESE & Sakhalin Island
Sakhalin Island used to be Japanese. One of "Russia's" criminal aliases, aka USSR stole it from Japan in 1945. The Japanese want it back.
If you are working on Russia, Japan, or Sakhalin island then you need this training video. If you are not then kindly recommend it to a colleague, friend, or relative who is.
"Russia" will collapse into its constituent (occupied) Republics. Lands stolen by the Tsars and Kommisars will be returned to their true owners.
Don't worry if you are literally Russian, there will also be places in the post-"Russian" Federation world for the smart Muscovites who figure out the corruptionnaire par excellence Vladikiller Putschin is an incompetent war criminal and help the rest of the world save Russians from Putin and his party "United Russia".
CIA online-campaign recruit-russian-spies
Meanwhile,
It's like I start learning Japanese and then:
Ukrainian Wins Japanese Beauty Contest https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68078061
This will be taken as scandalous and unacceptable by Japanese nationalists.
Japan should get all of Sakhalin island back after Russia collapses. The Ukrainian winner should make that point "We Ukrainians had our land stolen by Russia. I know something similar happened to Japan..." will get around the nationalists' hatred and fear.
A USEFUL CHATGPT PROMPT AND OUTPUT FOR LEARNING JAPANESE
This is a really basic grammar point but it seems accurate. Remember: chatgpt tells you what it BELIEVES to be the case, NOT what it "KNOWS" to be the case! It DOES deliver horribly bad inaccurate wrong answers!
So yeah, its like walking through a mind field. If it could be constrained to only deliver answers it is confident about that would be better. As it is, chatgpt enables disinformation. Just a matter of time till liars figure out how to "seed" the large language model with deliberately wrong information hoping to generate bad real world outcomes reflecting stupid people thinking chatgpt must be right when it clearly errs at times and does so because it delivers results even where the algorithm is uncertain about what actually is the case.
QUERY:
list japanese particles followed by their closest english equivalent
ChatGPT output:
は (wa) - This particle is used to mark the topic of the sentence and can be translated as "as for" or "regarding."
が (ga) - It marks the subject of a sentence and can often be translated as "but" or "however."
を (wo) - It indicates the direct object of a verb and can be translated as "to" or "for."
に (ni) - It is used to indicate a target or destination and can be translated as "to" or "in."
へ (he) - Similar to に (ni), it marks a direction or destination and can be translated as "towards" or "to."
で (de) - It indicates the location or means by which an action is performed and can be translated as "at" or "by."
と (to) - It connects nouns or phrases and can be translated as "and" or "with."
も (mo) - It is used to indicate inclusion or addition and can be translated as "also" or "even."
や (ya) - Similar to も (mo), it indicates inclusion or addition but is less specific and can be translated as "and" or "or."
から (kara) - It indicates the starting point for an action or the cause of something and can be translated as "from" or "because."
まで (made) - It marks the extent or limit of an action and can be translated as "until" or "to."
の (no) - It is used to indicate possession or a relationship between nouns and can be translated as "of" or "'s" (possessive case).
ね (ne) - It is a particle used at the end of a sentence to seek agreement or confirmation and can be translated as "right?" or "isn't it?"
よ (yo) - It is a particle used at the end of a sentence to emphasize a statement or command and can be translated as "you know" or "listen."
より (yori) - It indicates a comparison or preference and can be translated as "than" or "more than."
I do think chatgpt can be useful for generating scripts for CAT, AWK, SED, sql, and for generating RegExes (this last one is likeliest to generate broken results)
Feeling bold i then tried this query
which hiragana are also one character words?
I have to verify how (in)accurate the response is, caveat lector.
あ (a) - meaning "ah" or used to represent the sound of surprise い (i) - meaning "ee" or "yes" う (u) - meaning "oo" or "yes" え (e) - meaning "eh" or "yes" お (o) - meaning "oh" or "yes" か (ka) - meaning "mosquito" or "bite" さ (sa) - meaning "sand" or "grain" た (ta) - meaning "field" or "rice paddy" な (na) - meaning "many" or "a lot" は (ha) - meaning "tooth" or "teeth" ま (ma) - meaning "interval" or "space" や (ya) - meaning "8" or "eight" ら (ra) - meaning "Rachel" or "Rachel" (a given name) わ (wa) - meaning "peace" or "harmony
CODES AND CIPHERS: TALKING IN CODE
ERIC THE FOWL MOUTHED PARROT SAYS: FLOCK OFF!
RIDDLE
What's really good at mimicking lots of languages, and has a potty mouth? He is named Eric and is maaaaybe gonna get rehabilitated depending on just what he does with that Cracker called Vlad!
Decoding the BBC Parrot Article.
The numbers game: 8 is the Chinese lucky number, rhymes with the Chinese words for "dad" and "looking forward to".
92 is a reference to the return of Hong Kong in 1992.
3 and 5 are prime numbers. 3 is not an auspicious number, 3 as in third wheel, as in "the other woman".
Very large prime numbers are used typically for vigenere ciphers in training. Operational ciphers tend to use eliptical functions. The point is to have a one way function.
I can already predict the result. The entire flock will start cursing. All language students first and foremost want the dirty words. They want to get laid, and need to use the toilet.
"Mike? Row, Wave."
Sheila is of course Australian slang for a girl as in bimbo as in blondinka.
RELIGION, MORALITY, LAW: Refuting Streams theory
Streams theory is the idea that there is no final logic, no conclusion to an idea. It is possibly related to Buddhism, which refers to thoughts and perceptions the various streams (skandhas). To the logic of Buddhism there is ultimately no "self": you are not your ideas, nor are you your perceptions, your body also constantly changes comes into aggregation and disintegrates. In that sense streams theory is materialist, but in another sense it is not. Streams theory puts thoughts as a priori to things, since things (people) don't ultimately exist. To streams theory there are ultimately no facts, no right or wrong, and in this sense it is consistent with the (wrong) modern tendency to amorality, the mistaken idea that there is no right or wrong, neither in statements of act (ontology) nor in morality (axiology). It is also in that sense consistent with tantra, which is the idea that by indulgence and thus exhaustion of desire that the desire falls away leading to enlightenment. Lazy liberals absofuckingliterally love tantra, smoke, do drugs, fuck whores, that's tantra, because eventually you will get bored, burn out your desire -- or your body -- and reach enlightenment.
Enlightenment is simply the understanding of the universe as it really is. You are a part of it and in that sense exactly you are god, and so is everything and everyone else, even the mass murderers like Putin, just ask goddess Kali or here Thug devotees if you don't agree.
Too bad streams theory is wrong. There are ultimately facts. Things really do exist. That which truly exists cannot be created or destroyed even if it changes its structure. Thereto, we may understand various pre-Socratic paradoxes such as the ship of Theseus as getting at the idea of "no self". How many changes must the ship of Thesues (you, your body) undergo before it no longer exists? Likewise with the famous arrow which must first go half way to target and halfway to the remaining distance, and so on ad infinitum, and thus cannot ever reach the target and thus motion does not really exist. When in fact the arrow paradox shows us that space is discontinuous, not continuous, that just as their are ultimately indivisible elements of matter (a-toms, the uncut unsplit) there must also be indivisible spaces, that is empty "points" which cannot be occupied by matter. Though, the fact that matter and energy are mutually transformable (gravity and light and time are too) may make the pre-socratic debates about space, time, and matter less pertinent than they would otherwise be. Light is both a wave and a particle, and space though certainly discontinuous -- otherwise the arrow problem might illustrate not that motion is an illusion but rather that motion could not exist at all. All of these paradoxes dissolve if indeed time itself is an illusion and that all events have already occurred, that time is a circle, rather than a spiral. But time appears to be more like a spiral exhibiting development with common themes rather than a recurring circle, a loop, as many ancients thought.
Yet, it is a fact that space and time are convertible as are gravity, light, and time. There are indivisible particles. Space is discontinuous, as which is consistent with the observed fact of quantum teleportation and perhaps also the uncertainty principle, that we may know a quanta's location or its vector but not both because space is discontinuous and also because space is time.
Since facts do exist the idea that perceptions and ideas are mere streams which flow and change but have neither beginning nor end and thus are indeterminate is wrong.
Since factual and perceptual indeterminism are wrong so also moral relativism may be wrong, and it is, as anyone with one iota of practical reasoning (phronesis) would agree. Certain moral choices lead to a good life, and other moral choices lead to a bad life or to no life at all. See: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1268528
Once upon a time there was a girl who just wanted to save the sailors.
Except, she really existed.