All my books are available as Kindle Unlimited, Amazon’s flat fee all you can read subscription service. This means if you are on KU and want to read me - you already paid for it! amazon.com/author/quizm… ALL my books are right there, they are ALL kindle unlimited. You can also get my free weekly ebook giveaways right here on my substack. I myself am a Kindle Unlimited subscriber so if you have a book you wrote that you would like me to review just say! I write book reviews on amazon and goodreads. I wrote my heart out. https://amazon.com/author/quizmaster
Here are your free ebooks! Learn Chinese!
CHINESE VOCABULARY
Taming Dragons with Chinese Political Ideology
China: A Brief History
The Legend of Lady White Snake (Chinese Mythology + Dungeon Role Playing Games)
Watergate 2.0: Trump Card.
CAESAR CONQUERS! (The Invasion of Britain)
Part of a series: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B093BH7QCZ?binding=paperback
I wrote my heart out. https://amazon.com/author/quizmaster
Read muh books lol!
How Chinese Capitalists Might Save American Workers—By Undermining Elon Musk
In recent decades, global capitalism has been shaped by the interplay between American ultra-capitalists-such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Tim Cook-and the rising class of Chinese capitalists and state planners. While much of the 21st-century narrative has emphasized collaboration (e.g., Apple manufacturing in China, Tesla’s Shanghai expansion, Amazon’s reliance on Chinese supply chains), the dynamics of power and control are shifting. Increasingly, Chinese capitalists, operating within a state-directed system, are becoming a strategic threat to their American counterparts. This article explores that transformation, the underlying assumptions, and the possible consequences for U.S. labor and inequality.
Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Tim Cook built empires on the back of Chinese labor and supply chains. But as China’s economy turns inward and nationalistic, the very partnerships that fueled American ultra-capitalism may now be its undoing. And in a strange twist, that might be exactly what U.S. workers need.
The U.S. and China spent decades forging a high-stakes symbiosis. Silicon Valley got cheap manufacturing, soaring stock valuations, and just-in-time delivery. Beijing gained industrial know-how, capital, and access to global markets. But that old balance is collapsing—and fast.
The Chinese capitalist class, once happy to ride shotgun in the globalist vehicle driven by American tech giants, is now charting its own course. Backed by state power and driven by a clear nationalist strategy, Chinese CEOs and industrialists are transforming into geopolitical players. Their target isn’t just the global market—it’s the American model of capital itself.
From Workshop to Rival
The change didn’t come overnight. For years, U.S. corporations dominated with Chinese help. Apple became a trillion-dollar company with iPhones assembled in China. Tesla built a massive Gigafactory in Shanghai. Amazon rode a wave of low-cost Chinese goods straight into the hearts of American consumers.
But after Donald Trump’s trade war, COVID-19 supply disruptions, and intensifying scrutiny from both governments, China began pulling back. “Made in China 2025” wasn’t just a slogan—it was a mission. Beijing wants domestic innovation, global leadership in AI and green tech, and less dependence on American firms.
And it's working. China’s electric vehicle sector is exploding. BYD now outsells Tesla globally. Huawei’s latest chips shocked Western analysts with a level of sophistication that defied U.S. sanctions. Fintech giants like Alibaba are building payment ecosystems that bypass the dollar—and Western banks—altogether.
What used to be a pipeline for Western profits is becoming a rival network. And it’s starting to bite.
Billionaires on the Defensive
For U.S. tech titans, the risks are growing. Apple is scrambling to shift production to Vietnam and India. Amazon can’t quit Chinese goods without hitting its bottom line. Musk has played nice with Beijing—but his Shanghai factory may eventually be nationalized, copied, or outcompeted.
This isn’t Cold War 2.0—it’s capitalism versus capitalism. But one side has a plan. China’s capitalist-nationalist hybrid is coherent, aggressive, and willing to sacrifice short-term gains for long-term power. America’s ultra-capitalists, by contrast, have spent decades chasing quarterly earnings, avoiding taxes, and offshoring labor. Now, that playbook is failing.
The Labor Wildcard
Here’s the twist. As U.S. corporations find themselves boxed out of China, they may have no choice but to reinvest at home. And that could be a once-in-a-generation opening for American workers.
The Biden administration is already nudging corporations in that direction—with union support at Amazon warehouses, CHIPS Act subsidies for domestic manufacturing, and more hawkish stances on China. If reshoring becomes a trend rather than a talking point, unions could surge back. Jobs that vanished during the neoliberal era might begin to return—not out of compassion, but necessity.
In the perverse logic of geopolitics, the very competition that’s hurting Musk and Cook could help red-state towns abandoned by globalization. Not because capitalism grew a conscience, but because it hit a wall.
What the Future Looks Like
Fast forward a decade. China dominates EVs, green tech, and global AI hardware. Its fintech apps are everywhere from Africa to Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, American firms grapple with higher costs, tighter regulations, and rising labor demands.
That’s not a bad outcome for U.S. workers. It may even reduce inequality at the bottom. If jobs return to Michigan and Ohio, if unions gain real leverage again, it’ll be less due to domestic reform and more because America’s ultra-rich lost their favorite overseas escape hatch.
The Irony of Global Capital
Capitalism has always been full of contradictions. But few are as rich as this: China’s nationalistic billionaires, in waging economic war on their American counterparts, might inadvertently do more for the U.S. working class than any piece of progressive legislation in recent memory.
If the age of Musk and Bezos is waning, don’t count it as a tragedy. It might just be the start of a long-overdue reckoning.
Key Assumptions
1. Chinese capitalists are ultimately subordinate to state-directed objectives.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) maintains decisive control over major capital and industrial decisions. The crackdown on Jack Ma and restructuring of tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent underscore these boundaries.
2. American ultra-capitalists prioritize profit over national loyalty.
Major U.S. firms have offshored jobs, lobbied against regulation, and minimized taxes, making them vulnerable to shifts in Chinese policy.
3. Geopolitical fragmentation and “de-risking” are irreversible trends.
Both the U.S. and China are asserting greater sovereign control over supply chains, technologies, and capital flows.
4. Class conflict within the United States is intensifying.
Disruption in the power of ultra-capitalists creates opportunities for labor and unions to regain ground lost over forty years of neoliberalism.
Chinese capitalists, with state backing, are now moving from value extraction within the Western system to strategically undermining it:
Electric Vehicles (EVs): Chinese firms like BYD and NIO are now global competitors, threatening Tesla’s margins (Financial Times, 2024). Chinese EVs are poised to flood global markets, challenging Western dominance (Reuters, 2024).
Semiconductors and AI Hardware: The U.S. has restricted chip exports to China, but China is investing heavily in domestic alternatives. Huawei’s 7nm chip shocked the industry, signaling progress toward tech self-sufficiency (Bloomberg, 2023).
E-commerce and Fintech: Platforms like Alibaba and the digital yuan are building parallel financial ecosystems, especially in Africa and Southeast Asia, challenging Western payment systems (World Economic Forum, 2023; Quartz, 2023).
These moves are part of a coherent nationalist-capitalist strategy, turning previous dependencies into points of pressure.
Future Projections: Toward Economic Realignment
If current trends persist, by 2035:
China’s nationalist-capitalist bloc could dominate manufacturing, EVs, green energy, and AI hardware across Asia, Africa, and parts of Europe.
American ultra-capitalists may face higher input costs, fewer global expansion options, and more regulatory pressure at home.
U.S. labor could regain bargaining power, with unionization rates rising in tech-adjacent manufacturing and logistics.
Income inequality may narrow at the bottom as new jobs are created domestically and wages rise.
Conclusion: A Dialectic of Power
The current contest is not merely a trade war or tech rivalry, but a dialectic between transnational profit versus nationalist strategy. The Chinese model appears more coherent and capable of disciplining its capital class for broader objectives. As the American ultra-capitalist model falters, space opens for a rebalancing of labor and capital at home. Ironically, Chinese capitalists may do more to improve the material conditions of America’s working class-through strategic rivalry-than any progressive policy in a generation.
Word of the Day: FAILURE.
English: failure (n). Trump's attempt to impose peace in Ukraine will end in failure because Russia does not want peace, as Putin's refusal to meet with negotiators demonstrates.
French: échec (n). La tentative de Trump d'imposer la paix en Ukraine se soldera par un échec car la Russie ne veut pas la paix, comme le montre le refus de Poutine de rencontrer les négociateurs.
Spanish: fracaso (n). El intento de Trump de imponer la paz en Ucrania terminará en fracaso porque Rusia no quiere la paz, como se evidencia en la negativa de Putin de reunirse con los negociadores.
German: Versagen (n). Trumps Versuch, Frieden in der Ukraine durchzusetzen, wird in einem Versagen enden, weil Russland keinen Frieden will, wie Putins Weigerung, sich mit den Verhandlungsführern zu treffen, demonstriert.
Estonian: ebaõnnestumine. Trumpi püüed sunnida Ukraina rahulolu lõppeb segaduses, sest Venemaa tahab rahulolu, nagu Putini keeldumine kohtlema lõ Stady toimub.
Russian: провал (n)(m). Попытка Трампа навязать мир на Украине закончится провалом, поскольку Россия не хочет мира, что доказывает отказ Путина встречаться с переговорщиками.
Ukrainian: невдача (n)(f). Спроба Трампа нав'язати мир в Україні закінчиться провалом, тому що Росія не хоче миру, про що свідчить відмова Путіна зустрічатися з переговірниками.
Mandarin Chinese:
特兰铺试图让乌克兰实现和平将会失败,因为俄罗斯不希望和平,正如可以从普京拒绝会见谈判代表所见的那样。试图让乌克兰实现和平将会失败,因为俄罗斯不希望和平,正如可以从普京拒绝会见谈判代表所见的那样。
Tè lán pù shìtú ràng wūkèlán shíxiàn hépíng jiāng huì shībài, yīnwèi èluósī bù xīwàng hépíng, zhèngrú kěyǐ cóng pǔjīng jùjué huìjiàn tánpàn dàibiǎo suǒ jiàn dì nàyàng. Shìtú ràng wūkèlán shíxiàn hépíng jiāng huì shībài, yīnwèi èluósī bù xīwàng hépíng, zhèngrú kěyǐ cóng pǔjīng jùjué huìjiàn tánpàn dàibiǎo suǒ jiàn dì nàyàng.