Remember when I predicted Deep Daily strikes on Russian oil, aircraft, command structures, including targeted killings?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/25823518/russia-oil-refinery-fire-ukraine-putin-tucker-chat/
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/27710
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/02/09/fire-destroys-part-of-famous-writers-house-in-moscow-a84031
You're welcome.
If you have a specific targeting instruction feel free to
Traitor Gets 15 Years Jail: Other Countries Would have Executed Him.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cameron-ortis-sentencing-1.7105127
Why Canada plays an Outsize Role in Intelligence
1. Significant Slavic Minority. No longer "merely" Ukrainians in Manitoba, many slavs immigrated to Canada during the last 30 years. Climate is no obstacle.
2. Significant French population: Canada's federal government is legally bilinguals, so is New Brunswick, Quebec's official language is French and their are significant French population in Eastern Ontario and in the north further west, likely due to the fur trade back when Canada was still a majority Francophone country.
Thus, Canada is involved in British and French networks. Both the UK and France remain global powers.
A significant rural population, hardened by serious winters is accustomed to outdoor living, woodcraft, hunting, and thus Canadians make excellent soldiers.
Yet, being a middle power Canada is forced to compensate for its relatively sparse population with diplomacy: due to its strong linguistic diversity the Canadian diplomatic corps has no lack of expertise in foreign languages and cultures. Example: Hong Couver. Example: Little India.
THE “RUSSIA” HOUSE
Prediction: Rebellions will start in the "Russian" republics like Bashkortostan, Udmurtiya, and another dozen or two, which is where all Putin's cannon fodder are recruited from because they aren't even Russian let alone posh Muscovites or Peterites.
All the common people in Russia are gonna get tired of being murdered off so rich fucks in Moscow can ride yachts and party naked.
history-shows-that-no-ceasefire-or-treaty-with-russia-can-be-trusted/
HOW TO SABOTAGE A RAIL ROAD
Tools Required:
Sledgehammer
Crowbar
Optional: Large Wrench to loosen or remove bolts
Identify the locations of the bolts, pegs, and ties along the tracks.
Use the crowbar to pry open the connections between the rails and the ties.
Once you have loosened the connections, strike them forcefully with the sledgehammer to fully detach the rails from the ties.
Don't get caught.
КАК САБОТИРОВАТЬ ЖЕЛЕЗНУЮ ДОРОГУ И ПРИВЕСТИ К ЕЕ СОЙДУ
Кувалда
лом
Дополнительно: большой гаечный ключ для ослабления или снятия болтов.
Определите расположение болтов, колышков и связей вдоль направляющих.
Используйте лом, чтобы открыть соединения между рельсами и шпалами.
Ослабив соединения, сильно ударьте по ним кувалдой, чтобы полностью отсоединить рельсы от шпал.
Не попадайтесь.
UKRAINE'S STRATEGY AS PREDICTED HERE.
Fiona Hill imagines, wrongly, that we will always have to deal with Russia, when in fact "Russia" will wind up dismembered, denuclearized, stripped of a U.N. Veto and reduced to Muscovy.
Russia having killed off, driven away, or recruited their men aged 20-30 now faces labor shortages. Gravediggers have full employment!
https://realnoevremya.com/articles/7722-manpower-shortage-in-russia-makes-teenagers-in-demand
Reminder: I don't fight fair.
I have no shortage of weapons or munitions.
They say when the Chinese trumpet plays it is either something VERY sad or VERY happy, ONLY.(唢呐)
希 望 每 一 天 有 不 同 的 惊 喜 !
China
No surprise to me, China once again stabs Russia in the back. China will extract all the cheap oil and gas from Russia it can, do nothing as Russia's military is reduced, and if I get my way will foment rebellion inside Russia and even cross the Amur river to take back lands the Tsarist imperialists stole from China.
Prediction: I will get my way. When? Good Question! The answer will be surprising!
"All your base are belong to US!"
IDEOLOGY: UNITY IN CONFLICT (MAO ZEDONG)
The Maoist concept of "unity in conflict," delineated by Chairman Mao Zedong himself, embodies a sophisticated and strategic approach grounded in dialectical materialism. At its core, this concept posits that unity can emerge and be fortified amidst apparent conflicts, allowing for the progression of revolutionary forces towards a collective objective.
Unity in conflict recognizes the existence of contradictions within any given society, whether they are socio-economic, political, or ideological in nature. Rather than perceiving these conflicts as destructive or divisive, Maoism recognizes their potential to foster dynamism and change. Conflict, then, is viewed not solely as a disruption but as an integral catalyst for societal advancement. Heraclites, Marx, and Mao (unlike Pythagoreans) argue that history is driven forward in an upward dialectical spiral by conflict and its resolution.
Integral to this concept is Mao's identification of two primary contradictions within a society—the principal contradiction and the secondary contradiction. The principal contradiction denotes the conflict that significantly defines the overarching societal struggle. Meanwhile, secondary contradictions are of lesser magnitude, seeking to modify or influence the principal contradiction.
Unity in conflict strategically manipulates these contradictions by employing various tactics including mobilization, negotiation, and ideological campaigns. These methods aim to transform conflicts into tools of cohesion, engendering unity while objectively addressing the underlying contradictions. By forging unity amidst these conflicts, societal progress can be achieved.
To effectively implement unity in conflict, Maoists advocate for a dialectical approach. Dialectics, a philosophical framework that perceives the world as constantly changing and conflicting, emphasizes contradictions as the driving force for development. This epistemological lens allows for a nuanced understanding of conflicts, enabling the identification of common ground and shared goals between seemingly opposing forces.
Maoist ideology elucidates the need to acknowledge contradictions within society and harness their potential for progress. By embracing unity in conflict, societies can avoid stagnation and foster a dynamic environment conducive to revolutionary change. It emphasizes a strategic approach that identifies and navigates contradictions skillfully, transforming them into unifying forces that propel society forward.
Unity in conflict embraces the inherent contradictions present within societies as impelling progress. Through materialist analysis and dialectical analysis, conflicts can be harnessed strategically, fostering unity and forging a path towards collective objectives. This comprehensive framework recognizes the intricacies of societal conflicts and underscores their transformative potential.
SINO-AMERICAN ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND MILITARY COMPETITION AS AN EXAMPLE OF UNITY-IN-CONFLICT
"Unity in Conflict" is the idea of an equilibrium between US economic cooperation with China and the parallel military competition that exists between those two powers. Complex and stratified, multivariate, unity-in-conflict phenomenon emerges from the interdependence of economic interweaving alongside the potential for strategic or security divergences.
Economically, the United States and China remain deeply entwined and have established a symbiotic relationship. Their fortunes are directly interlinked. Mutual economic cooperation presents a profound opportunity for both nations to foster further growth and prosperity. Nevertheless, economic cooperation co-exists alongside military and security competition and the potential for conflict. Countervailing interests, divergent governance systems, and disparities in trade practices engender a state of continual tension. This friction stimulates both resilience and reciprocity, compelling China and the USA alike to adapt, innovate, and leverage their respective strengths.
Alongside economic cooperation, the military competition between China and the United States exemplifies the "Unity in Conflict" concept. The two States, driven by distinct aspirations and ideological underpinnings, engage in a subtle yet fierce pursuit of military dominance. This rivalry, although inherently opposed, compels each side to bolster their military capabilities, invest in advanced technologies, and enhance strategic postures. Consequently, conflict stimulates innovation and progress, hopefully resulting in effective deterrence to prevent conflicts from turning into wars or even "mere" proxy wars.
The underlying unity as a theoretical matter exists in the recognition of the inevitability or even indispensability of conflict as a catalyst for progress. Through this dialectical relationship, the unity and conflict of opposites, both the United States and China engage in a the symbiosis of cooperation and competition. Economic cooperation serves as a bridge for interdependence and mutual benefits, fostering stability and shared prosperity. Concurrently, military competition drives technological advancements, refined strategies, and amplifies defense capabilities, engendering deterrence and ensuring stability.
While seemingly contradictory, this "Unity in Conflict" paradigm underscores the nuanced nature of contemporary great power relations. By acknowledging the multifaceted layers of competition and interdependence, the United States and China can strike the balance required to navigate the complex terrain of international relations. By effectively managing this interplay, both can harness the paradoxical forces of cooperation in conflict to foster progress while mitigating the risks of escalation.
The intricate interplay of US economic cooperation and concurrent military competition with China epitomizes the concept of "Unity in Conflict." It is through the recognition of the inextricable link between cooperation and competition that nations evolve, innovate, and adapt. By comprehending this symbiotic relationship, the United States and China navigate the path to a sustainable coexistence, promoting prosperity, stability, and safeguarding their respective national interests.
CHINESE WALLS
The way to achieve this, obviously, is to use "Chinese walls" to separate financial and economic aspects of Sino-American relations from military security issues.
Chinese walls refers to a term used in the financial industry to describe the strict information barrier that is put in place to prevent conflicts of interest between different divisions or departments within the same institution. The term originated from the Great Wall of China, which was known for its ability to keep invaders out.
Chinese walls are typically established in financial institutions such as banks, investment firms, or brokerage houses, where there is a need for the separation of sensitive information to ensure fair dealing, prevent insider trading, and safeguard client confidentiality. The purpose of these walls is to prevent the misuse or unauthorized sharing of information that could potentially benefit one division at the expense of another or compromise client interests.
Chinese walls are commonly implemented between departments involved in trading and research, investment banking and advisory services, and investment management and compliance. For example, the information asymmetry between a bank's research department (which provides analysis and recommendations on stocks) and its trading department (which executes trades) is managed through strict policies and procedures to prevent the leak of non-public or privileged information that could be used for personal gains.
Establishing and maintaining Chinese walls involves a range of measures, including physical separation, restricted access to certain information, secure communication channels, and strict protocols for handling confidential data. The employees within the institution are required to adhere to these policies and are often subject to surveillance or monitoring to ensure compliance.
Regulatory bodies, such as securities commissions and financial regulators, may also require financial institutions to establish Chinese walls as part of their legal obligations. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in severe penalties, including fines, loss of license, or legal action.
Overall, Chinese walls are essential in maintaining the integrity of the financial industry, ensuring fair treatment of clients, and avoiding conflicts of interest.
In the context of operational security, Chinese walls refer to a set of policies, procedures, and controls that are put in place to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information within an organization. This term is commonly used in industries such as finance, law, and consulting, where the sharing of information between different teams or individuals within the same organization may pose a conflict of interest or a breach of confidentiality.
Chinese walls are primarily designed to mitigate the potential risks that arise when employees have access to sensitive or confidential information that could influence their decision-making process or lead to conflicts of interest. These walls ensure that individuals or teams who have access to certain sensitive information are prohibited from sharing it with others who may have conflicting interests or responsibilities.
The implementation of Chinese walls typically involves the following measures:
Access controls: Access to sensitive information is restricted to only those individuals or teams who have a legitimate need to access it. This helps to minimize the risk of unauthorized disclosure.
Information segregation: Sensitive information is segregated or compartmentalized to prevent unauthorized access. Different teams or individuals may have access only to specific compartments or areas, which reduces the likelihood of information leakage.
Physical separation: In some cases, physical separation may be implemented to ensure that teams or individuals with conflicting interests are physically separated from each other. This can minimize the possibility of accidental or intentional information sharing.
Communication monitoring: Organizations may implement monitoring mechanisms to keep track of communication channels, such as emails or phone calls, to identify any potential breaches or violations of the Chinese walls.
Training and awareness: Employees are educated about the importance of maintaining confidentiality and the specific requirements regarding Chinese walls. Training programs are conducted to ensure all employees understand and comply with the organization's policies and procedures.
Chinese walls are a critical component of operational security as they help to safeguard sensitive information, maintain client confidentiality, and prevent conflicts of interest within an organization. By implementing these controls, organizations can ensure the integrity of their processes and protect the interests of their clients.
IRAN
I am not listing the various escalations which have occurred in Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, Gaza because they are just as I predicted and very numerous...
LEARN FOREIGN LANGUAGES
Learning foreign languages and learning arithmetic are different in several ways:
1. Context: Learning foreign languages involves understanding and using words, grammar, and syntax to communicate with others in a different language. It requires understanding cultural nuances, idioms, and context-specific vocabulary. On the other hand, learning arithmetic focuses on understanding and applying mathematical concepts, operations, formulas, and solving numerical problems.
2. Cultural and Social Elements: Learning foreign languages often includes exploring and immersing oneself in the culture, literature, history, and traditions of the language's native speakers. It involves understanding the social dynamics, customs, and etiquette associated with the language. In contrast, arithmetic is a universal concept, and its learning is not influenced by cultural or social elements.
3. Subjectivity and Creativity: Learning foreign languages involves subjective aspects such as interpretation, expression, and personal style. It requires creativity in using words and grammar to convey thoughts, emotions, and ideas effectively. Conversely, arithmetic is based on objective rules and logic, with less room for subjectivity or creativity
4. Skills and Practice: Learning foreign languages primarily focuses on developing listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills. It requires practice in verbal and written communication, pronunciation, vocabulary expansion, and comprehension. On the other hand, learning arithmetic emphasizes problem-solving skills, logical thinking, numerical manipulation, and calculation accuracy through practice and repetition.
5. Pronunciation and Phonetics: Learning foreign languages often includes mastering specific sounds, intonations, and phonetics that may not exist in one's native language. It requires training the ear to differentiate and produce unfamiliar sounds accurately. In contrast, arithmetic does not involve pronunciation or phonetic challenges.
6. Cultural Sensitivity: Learning foreign languages requires being aware and respectful of different cultural norms, values, and sensitivities. It is crucial to understand appropriate language use in various situations and avoid potential cultural misunderstandings. Arithmetic does not involve cultural sensitivity in the same way.
Learning foreign languages and learning arithmetic have different focuses, skills, contexts, and cultural elements, making the two quite distinct in nature.
RELIGION
I have earlier explained that whether time is ultimately circular or instead everything happens instantaneously and thus time is an illusion our objective is first to see into the past to better comprehend, cope, and control the present, but ultimately our goal is to not merely predict but also to see and experience future events before they happen. The stage after that is to influence future events. This is why some elements appear anachronistic and that human growth is by fits-and-starts.
Making your dreams come true.
Summary: goal oriented reasoning backward chaining using imagination visualization emotion to make an event happen
Lesson: Part of comprehending and thus controlling reality is knowing your own desires so you can make them real in constructive and enjoyable experiences.
Did Paul hijack Jesus's teachings?
The Rabbi here speaks well. His friend however is probably somehow in error. He is wearing a Valknot, which is the three intertwined triangles. They represent past-present-future. However, it's a symbol for death, the dead, and is used as a gravemarker. There is no way I would ever wear that. I don't regard it as a nazi symbol, though "white nationalists" like to latch onto all sorts of pagan symbols. Anyway, it's Odinist. Whether the gentleman liberally adorned in gravemarkers talking with a Rabbi is crazy, evil,or stupid is nothing I can comment on since this is the first time I've ever seen him.
Saint Paul was crazy and probably had epilepsy.